31 May 2006
Jim,
We are entering a very delicate subject here, that could only be understood through churning, and according to our sanskars. If I may quote a translation (a human filter) from a Murli clarification (5.3.86) tape 49, last page:
"Just like they formed a misunderstanding in the Brahmin world that Krishna's soul is the one who is teaching, the same misunderstanding should not occur here that the soul of Ram is the one who is teaching"
I am aware of the problem of using quotes, but when we interpret Gyan we use our own manmat, and we automatically influence another soul. This is an absurd situation for me because I am very keen on sharing what I know because this Gyan is so extraordinary it has to be shared, but at the same time I cannot possibly not put my manmat into it, because I am not God.
Let's say that the teacher is God, but Shiv has no mouth, and no mind to control, so he needs a Chariot to do his work. and this Chariot is going to be Prajapita when he will be revealed as the Father of humanity, and he is a model to follow. As I understand in this clarification, he is the most manmanabhav, in that we have to follow him. He is the most soul conscious, the nearest we can get to God, and Bapsaman at the end.
What I do not completely understand is when there is the teaching of ShivBaba going on (the classes?) and when there is a space for Ram's churning. Apparently, when questions are asked to him, all what he answers is Murli quote, so cannot have any manmat or wrong interpretation in it.
About the Advance Course in Kampil, I think the Sisters learn by heart their bit, if a question is asked and they are not certain about it, they ask directly to Baba. The course is regularly updated according to the Murli clarifications that come up. So it is as near as can be from truth.