Do you have any hard documents justifying the statement? I mean do you have any original Murli and the same Murli with revised versions to support your statement. This is what I am looking for.
So, a witness says ”I saw the original document many years ago and the current one is heavily edited”, and you say to the witness rather than the possessor of the documents, ”Show me the original?”
A so-called ”university” which
openly tells its ”students’ that it is distributing "
revised Sakar" Murlis but doesn’t make available the earlier versions lacks the integrity and standards to call itself ”university”.
When Copernicus proved the heliocentric solar system, did the universities of Europe then refuse to say they ever thought differently about earlier theories (or that they always said it was heliocentric) Did they hide the now proven wrong documents - or did they see them as valuable in their own right as historical documents of the evolution of astronomy?
The counter claim about proof of God - I’d say What evidence do you have Dad Lekhraj even existed? Show me the hard evidence.
Many here have told of our experiences which add up to many decades, over different periods. Some of us were deeply involved in the inner core of BK activity. Some of us for a long time. Why are we here spending time debating knuckleheads? (Nothing personal - just being humorous)
No one here is paid, the forum doesn’t contribute to anyone’s wealth or health. We write here of our experience for the same reason we (and you) became BKs - a desire for truth and substance in life. We want to let people know of the many masks and the many faces that the BKs have.
The truth hurts sometimes. As Tanya said, you need to ask for the same burden of proof of all sides. As was said by the late Christopher Hitchens "“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
This site has many documents and archives. I have my living memory. Although many don't like the tone of many posts here, it is the substance that needs to be argued.
Printed revised Sakar Murli used to be started with ”Song: (name of Hindi song played in meditation before Lekhraj spoke the ”Murli”)”. It then went straight into the Murli verbatim translated many from tape recordings (some still exist) and others from handwritten transcriptions made at the time. The main part of the Murli ran for at least two to three full pages, single space small (Times) font sometimes it even went for four pages. All Murli. The last line was always ”To long lost now found children, yad pyuar form etc etc etc” and nothing after it.
It was only later that a question was edited in - after the song and before the Murli proper - to give an indication of a main theme to watch out for. Only later did a postscript ”Essence” get put in, and later still the dharna points. These often distracted IMO from the main theme of the the Murli, i.e. it was subjective.
There was no ”essence” summary, there was no ”points for dharna” - all of these were added later as the main body of the Murli shrunk while the line spacing and font got bigger; the whole thing today barely makes two pages (when its a long Murli). Often the main body of the Murli is one page. Take out the add-ons and it's sometimes less than a page.