Dear BK and PBK Brothers,
It is good to see that the topic of peacock and its relation with purity has been raised. Please share your views on the following.
I have been thinking very deeply on this subject of 'mor-pankh'(peacock feathers) and its relation with 'purity'; what we have been taught in basic and Advanced Knowledge is that Krishna is adorned with peacock feather as a sign of purity, because peacock and pea-hen do not have bodily contact and they reproduce when the pea-hen drinks the tears of the peacock; but my dillemma is that, if all through'out 5000 years the peacock and peahen do not have body-contact (meaning they remain pure) and reproduce; then why is it that, after Copper Age all human beings including Krishna (with whom the mor-pankh is associated in Sangamyug and bhakti-marg) and Ram (who plays paramatma part in Sangamyug) have to become patit and impure and have to mate bodily to reproduce??????
If peacock and peahen remain ever-pure for 5000 years and reproduce asexually, then why cannot humans do the same for 5000 years (as we all know that humans are superior to birds) ;
Also if mor-pankh is a sign of purity then it should have been associated with Shankar who is the only devta who never becomes patit-impure (Murli point- ''Shankar kabhi patit nahin banta''); why should mor-pankh be associated with only Krishna who supposedly remains pure for 2500 years and then becomes impure for 2500 years (no. 1 pure and no. 1 impure); That is my dillemma??
Is there any other logical explanation for Krishna being adorned with mor-pankh?? Can any PBK or BK please throw some light on this very ill-understood issue.
shivsena.
It is good to see that the topic of peacock and its relation with purity has been raised. Please share your views on the following.
I have been thinking very deeply on this subject of 'mor-pankh'(peacock feathers) and its relation with 'purity'; what we have been taught in basic and Advanced Knowledge is that Krishna is adorned with peacock feather as a sign of purity, because peacock and pea-hen do not have bodily contact and they reproduce when the pea-hen drinks the tears of the peacock; but my dillemma is that, if all through'out 5000 years the peacock and peahen do not have body-contact (meaning they remain pure) and reproduce; then why is it that, after Copper Age all human beings including Krishna (with whom the mor-pankh is associated in Sangamyug and bhakti-marg) and Ram (who plays paramatma part in Sangamyug) have to become patit and impure and have to mate bodily to reproduce??????
If peacock and peahen remain ever-pure for 5000 years and reproduce asexually, then why cannot humans do the same for 5000 years (as we all know that humans are superior to birds) ;
Also if mor-pankh is a sign of purity then it should have been associated with Shankar who is the only devta who never becomes patit-impure (Murli point- ''Shankar kabhi patit nahin banta''); why should mor-pankh be associated with only Krishna who supposedly remains pure for 2500 years and then becomes impure for 2500 years (no. 1 pure and no. 1 impure); That is my dillemma??
Is there any other logical explanation for Krishna being adorned with mor-pankh?? Can any PBK or BK please throw some light on this very ill-understood issue.
shivsena.