arjun wrote:Today, as I was churning on Shivsena's concept of RamShivbaba, a thought occured to me that just as BKs put 'pitashri' (i.e. Brahma Baba/Dada Lekhraj/soul of Golden Aged Krishna) before 'ShivBaba Yaad hai' in the Murlis and thus committed the blunder of making the son (i.e. Krishna) the God of Gita instead of ShivBaba, in the same way, are we not witnessing a phenomenon in the Confluence Age where the soul of Ram is being placed ahead of ShivBaba and being presented as the God of Gita instead of ShivBaba????
It may be noted that ShivBaba has never used the term 'RamShivbaba' in the Sakar Murlis or Avyakt Vanis or in the clarification Murlis.
Yes, for months I've thought the same thing, what can be said? It seems so basic, but ShivBaba (via Virendra Dev Dixit) has described it as 'the greatest atrocity/blunder .' See link; Religio-Political World History, Geo. & Philosophy - The Tree (bottom right). The relationship is based on recognition and co-operation, both in the Confluence Age and the 63 births. The Cycle continues to spin. Ooom Shaanti .
Hey, next year is the year of 'effort over a long period' coming to a close. It's a bonus year. whatever you gotta do, do it, and make it everlasting. Anyone care to join me in a deep and sustained way let me know. Am planning a world tour. Let's do it. .
shivsena wrote:Shrimat cannot be there during the shooting period; neither the Murlis contain any Shrimat, nor the cassettes (Advanced Knowledge) contain any Shrimat; Murlis of Shivbap contain The Knowledge in code form (which every soul decodes according to his intellect) and this in turn decides his fate for 84 births; Advanced Knowledge is just pure Bhakti taught by mayavi Krishna and the soul who realises this fact becomes mayajeet numberwise and becomes eligible to come in rosary bead of 108; Shrimat is given to only 108 souls, who will learn RajYoga from Ramshivbaba in future; Shrimat is not for praja souls; this is what I feel.
Arjun wrote:Today, as I was churning on Shivsena's concept of RamShivbaba, a thought occured to me that just as BKs put 'pitashri' (i.e. Brahma Baba/Dada Lekhraj/soul of Golden Aged Krishna) before 'ShivBaba Yaad hai' in the Murlis and thus committed the blunder of making the son (i.e. Krishna) the God of Gita instead of ShivBaba, in the same way, are we not witnessing a phenomenon in the Confluence Age where the soul of Ram is being placed ahead of ShivBaba and being presented as the God of Gita instead of ShivBaba????
VCD* NO.364, AUDIO CASSETTE NO.850, DATED 7.12.05, BANGALORE mini-Madhubans
CLARIFICATION OF NIGHT CLASS, Murli DATED 21.1.67 AND 23.1.67,
Ref. No.VCD*.,
So, it is also fitted into the intellect that – the Father, who transforms a man to Narayan, a woman to Lakshmi must have certainly existed; but what is the mistake that has been committed? Hm? (Someone said – Krishna, the God of Gita ...) Yes. In The Knowledge of Gita, in that knowledge of Gita, the name of Krishna has been inserted as the name of the Creator. Well, the name of child Krishna has been inserted; so, it is like an abuse (gaali). The God Father has also been humiliated. The child has been made to sit as the husband of the mother. A cruelty (zulma) has been done. When such an atrocity (zulma) takes place on the God Father also and when such an atrocity takes place on the mother also, then this world becomes a terrible hell (ghor nark).