According to PBKs the recorded versions of Murlis & Avyakt Vanis through Brahma's mouth can only be called as Shrimat. They also believe in upliftment through Shrimat & downfall from manmat (personal opinion).
But PBKs believe that Virendra Dev Dixit (Virendra Dev Dixit) is also a corporeal Chariot of ShivBaba. Then in PBK's defination of Shrimat, why spoken versions 1) of ShivBaba through Virendra Dev Dixit & 2) of Virendra Dev Dixit after incarnation of ShivBaba in his body, are not included in Shrimat? If these spoken versions are Shrimat, then the PBKs defination of Shrimat must be changed.
Are the clarifications of the Murlis & Avyakt Vanis through Virendra Dev Dixit not Shrimat? Are they manmat (personal opinion)? If these clarifications are not Shrimat, then they must be manmat. Then they will lead to downfall of PBKs. If these clarifications are neither Shrimat nor manmat, then in which type of mat (opinion) they should be added?
Now Avyakt Vanis of Brahma are also included in Shrimat. But Virendra Dev Dixit's role is superior to that of Lekhraj Brahma according to PBKs, then why are Virendra Dev Dixit's speaches are not Shrimat?