arjun wrote:Actually I should have written 'Father Shiv' instead of 'BapDada', because BapDada includes the soul of Ram and Krishna also who do not possess the power of causing divine visions/trance.
It might be best to stick to the basics and just say "the soul of Lekhraj Kirpalani".
Why confuse things? This is 'off topic', but please let me ask, what does 'Ram' mean to the PBKs and what does 'Krishna' mean to the PBKs?
Ram to the BKs means the ruler of the Silver Age, Krishna the first child of the Golden Age that becomes Narayan, the ruler of the Golden Age.
It must confuse the hell out of classical Hindus to say that Brahma is Ram *and* Krishna that becomes Narayan but in the meanwhile enters the body of Shankar with Shiva ... they would be rolling around the floor laughing at your teacher.
And if you want to name call *every* Hindu god, why miss out Hanuman and Ganesh?
arjun wrote:is caused to it as per its role in drama or due to the blessing of Father Shiv
Just to keep this slightly on topic, you say that some channelling or psychic manifestation is caused by Shiv, does this not give Shiva a sense of will enacting on others?
I do not see how 'Drama' can do anything as it is not a person or being. "As per its role" sounds just like, "we do not know".
Of course, I appreciate that you are not God and do not represent the organisation's point of view officially.