Re: Why I Cannot Believe in the Brahma Kumaris' 5,000 Year C
Posted: 17 Apr 2019
vlakshmi wrote:The way population multiplies gives a clue. For example, 4 children can be born from 2 persons in less than 5 years. Even if we assume that it takes 150 years for 4 children to be born from 2 persons, it would take only 4950 (150 x 32) years to have present population of 7.7 billion [2 multiplied 32 times] from just two persons.
I make that 8,589,934,592 ... but what is the revelance? BKism teaches that the initial population is 900,000 and goes on to state there are only 2 children per generation, not 4, for 1,250 years and 3 children per generation for the next 1,250 years.
Therefore, please base your argument on BK Gyan not some abstract, illogical and 'simply' incorrect mathematics.
Firstly, can I ask you an honest question, are you here to discuss these matter seriously? Is your mind open to discussion, or closed?
Will you ready to accept honest critiques, and will you question and examine your beliefs where they are proven incorrect, illogical or unsustainable?
Unfortunately, you have started basing your argument on "simple mathematics" ... and then immediately blow your argument apart by it.
If you wish to defend BK Gyan, could you please base your mathematics on the BK Gyan and work it out for us?
Start with 900,000. You should find the ages of marriage and procreation in the Murlis. Your mathematics need to hit 330 million by year 2,500 (stated population at end of BKs' Silver Age), and then account for the known population figures for the last few hundred years which ... if you are serious about doing ... I will help you find.
Thank you. I have hoped to find a BK willing to do so for some time.