vlakshmi,
ex-l is asking you, who are proposing mathematics as the proof of the truth that the BK God is the true God telling true knowledge, to do the maths based on the factors revealed by that very same BK "God". Nothing more nothing less.
The Murlis have clearly stated the numbers as ex-l has quoted for those key points in the Kalpa. Now you have to complete the calculation to make it cohesive, with those God- given markers as the constants, the calibrations. That’s all.
As far as I am concerned, BK-system is the most-suited to my sanskar
Sanskar, from ancient prakrit word -
Samkara meaning (my definition) the psychodynamic template that determines
how we are conscious of things, what form consciousness will take in response to things.
Sanskara/ Samkara are a psychological template;
Samma - complete or total (same PIE root as the latin ”Sum” - we’re back to maths! and
kara - to do, made, action. A
sanskara or
samkara is an aggregation, a construct, as temporary and as malleable as any other ideological construct.
And you say
BK-system is the most-suited to my sanskar
That's what I was telling you. You have found the BK teachings, moulding them to fit your self-constructed framework. It is the equivalent of the political advice - 'do not launch an inquiry into something if you are not already sure that the outcome will be favourable to you'. It is like a detective recording only the evidence that will prove a desired outcome and ignoring the rest, and even going to the extent of fabrication and verballing, to achieve a predetermined judgement.
The temporary nature of sanskaras is part of BKism, the teachings are to change your sanskaras, right? But what BKs teach is not to understand the very ground of being but a secondary level of aggregated temporary phenomena. The only sanskaras they are interested in are those that reinforce your dependence on their teachings, they are not interested in deconstructing the spiritual experience or having you graduate from their ”university”. They want you as a perpetual fee paying student. They are not there to liberate you from anything, rather to bind you to that which keeps you contributing to BK org’s success.
ex-l’s challenge is to say to you, if precision is part of your ’sanskaras’ ( which you presented) - here’s an anomaly.
__________________
You refer to ego - but ego is not about arrogance or humility, they are different and distinct qualities. A so-called ”Spiritual University" should at least be able to define terms accurately, instead of using them as ignorantly as primary school level street pundits out to grift a few dollars from passers by.
Ego literally and simply means ”I”. Who do I think I am? To think "I am" is to construct mentally, a construct of consciousness.
But ”I” am only one aspect of my Self. How do you see yourself?
Being
nimit is one more ego construct. Being a BK is an ego construct. Rather, even less than that, each of those is a
persona, a ‘front’, a mask, adopted to please the ego that likes to think of itself as virtuous and humble. To say. "I am a soul” is an ego construct.
The BKs teach their students to stay within the realm of prescribed mentation, affirmations, a pleasant kind of delusional thinking.
The basis of what you've argued is, firstly, placing value judgements on terms
( ego = bad), secondly, justifying them with equivocations
( BK ego = pure ego, royal ego) and imagined narratives that convince you of your opinion (
do you feel the world is not right and that you are special, there’s a sense of purpose needing as home? Try BKIVV for a cleaner brighter wash) ?
You need to see through the jargon, the wrappings, the ribbons. I am no fan of Plato but one thing he said that rings true - the greatest lie is that which is closest to truth.
So, what is closest to truth without being true?
That which fits our "sanskaras" or putting it another way, that which we want to be true.