aimée wrote:What does it mean PBK on paper only and not in real life? Doesn't it mean that, really, you are not a PBK? And if you really wanted to learn from PBKs, then you would not oppose them, and you would not try to impose your ideas, which are directly going against Advanced Knowledge.
Hi Aimee
Would it be fair to say to you that you do seem to be somewhat concerned with those that you feel are 'against' Advanced Knowledge' (A/K) (as taught by the PBKs) at the moment? It is possible that I am interpreting things incorrectly but are you saying that if anyone speaks up against this supposedly A/K then they are in opposition?
If this is so I'd like to share that I consider (and I grant you that I do not know much Advanced Knowledge at present) 'Gyani knowledge' to be very limited and limiting and not very advanced at all, in terms of my current studies and philosophies.
However, this does not stop me identifying that BK/PBK teachings don't have some merit even if I don't accept everything within these practices as being correct.
What I pick up from your posting above is that you are saying that anyone who 'imposes' their own ideas is opposing A/K ... If this is so, then I can humbly suggest that you reconsider your position. In my view, surely the more Advanced types of knowledge one learns, should make one more open and receptive to other ideals and philosophies as well?
Or are you, like I have previously posted, saying that its not whats said, its about how it is said that concerns you?
What say you? Regards ~ p~