new world
Lakshmi and Narayan
In the picture of Lakshmi and Narayan, beneath their feet, it has been written that 'Sanvat starting from 1 to 2,500 years'. PBKs clarify that these 2,500 years are the total period of 8 dynasties of Golden Aged Lakshmi and Narayan (1,250 years) & 12 dynasties of Silver Aged Ram-Sita (1,250 years). Total period of these 20 (8 + 12) dynasties comprises 2,500 years of the dynasty of successive generations of confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan.
In the counting of 12 dynasties of Silver Aged Ram-Sita, the souls of Shankar-Parvati are taken into account (by PBKs), as 1st couple of Ram-Sita. But in the counting of 8 dynasties of Lakshmi and Narayan, souls of Brahma-Saraswati are consided as 1st generation Golden Aged Lakshmi and Narayan. Here confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan (same souls of Shankar-Parvati), are not considered as 1st generation of Lakshmi and Narayan. If according to PBKs, confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan are founders of Lakshmi and Narayan dynasty, then they must belong to that dynasty of Lakshmi and Narayan. Then why they (confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan) are not considered as 1st Lakshmi and Narayan?
PBKs also believe that 1st couple of (Golden Aged) Lakshmi and Narayan is 16 celestial degree complete. But they don't say anything about celestial degrees of confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan. Its a simple logic that two souls cannot have the same amount of celestial degrees. There must be some difference. So nobody can say that both confluence aged & Golden Aged Lakshmi and Narayan have the same amount of celestial degrees. But PBKs will not accept that celestial degrees of confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan are less than that of Golden Aged Lakshmi and Narayan. And logic says that celestial degrees of both Lakshmi and Narayan are not exactly equal. Then we have to accept the third option that celestial degrees of confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan MUST BE on higher level than that of Golden Aged Lakshmi and Narayan. Now 16 celestial degree means 100% complete.
On the absolute scale of measurement, nothing can be greater than 100%. Then what can you say about the mathematics of celestial degrees of confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan? Are they even more pure than 100% (16 degree)?
In the picture of Lakshmi and Narayan, beneath their feet, it has been written that 'Sanvat starting from 1 to 2,500 years'. PBKs clarify that these 2,500 years are the total period of 8 dynasties of Golden Aged Lakshmi and Narayan (1,250 years) & 12 dynasties of Silver Aged Ram-Sita (1,250 years). Total period of these 20 (8 + 12) dynasties comprises 2,500 years of the dynasty of successive generations of confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan.
In the counting of 12 dynasties of Silver Aged Ram-Sita, the souls of Shankar-Parvati are taken into account (by PBKs), as 1st couple of Ram-Sita. But in the counting of 8 dynasties of Lakshmi and Narayan, souls of Brahma-Saraswati are consided as 1st generation Golden Aged Lakshmi and Narayan. Here confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan (same souls of Shankar-Parvati), are not considered as 1st generation of Lakshmi and Narayan. If according to PBKs, confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan are founders of Lakshmi and Narayan dynasty, then they must belong to that dynasty of Lakshmi and Narayan. Then why they (confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan) are not considered as 1st Lakshmi and Narayan?
PBKs also believe that 1st couple of (Golden Aged) Lakshmi and Narayan is 16 celestial degree complete. But they don't say anything about celestial degrees of confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan. Its a simple logic that two souls cannot have the same amount of celestial degrees. There must be some difference. So nobody can say that both confluence aged & Golden Aged Lakshmi and Narayan have the same amount of celestial degrees. But PBKs will not accept that celestial degrees of confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan are less than that of Golden Aged Lakshmi and Narayan. And logic says that celestial degrees of both Lakshmi and Narayan are not exactly equal. Then we have to accept the third option that celestial degrees of confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan MUST BE on higher level than that of Golden Aged Lakshmi and Narayan. Now 16 celestial degree means 100% complete.
On the absolute scale of measurement, nothing can be greater than 100%. Then what can you say about the mathematics of celestial degrees of confluence aged Lakshmi and Narayan? Are they even more pure than 100% (16 degree)?