joel wrote:I thought comparison of self to others was anathema to personal growth, and proscribed by BKs.
Well, you see Joel, accepting objectivity, or objectively true knowledge, is a very high level of personal growth
... and you have just not reached that level yet! Perhaps it is a matter of terminology, define "topness" just as I asked elsewhere "define spirituality", e.g. the 8 most spiritual ... most yogi ... most pure ... most acquiescent channels. But, a fair question, could we open this up for PBKs to explain the larger subject of numberwise? What you could be questioning, Joel, is the whole issue of setting souls against each other in competition and using ambition to encourage spiritual efforts, e.g. to become one of the 8, 108, 16,108 etc., feels a little unenlightened.
It was never made 100% clear to me if the 8 were included in the 108, nor both included in the 16,108, e.g. was it really 8, 100 and then 16,000. What was the connection between the numbers?
No one really knew, they were just sort of jokey icons for speculative topics of conversation.
What I have picked up from PBKs is that there are seed souls, root souls and then the expansion. Does that mean 8 seeds and 8 roots etc?
If God begot the 8 and then through the 8 became the 100 and through the 100 became the 16,000 and then through the 16,000 became the 900,000 etc I could understand it, like a single river splitting into 8, then 108, then 16,108 subsidiaries etc. One could not grow to become "one of the 8", one could only
realize one's self to be one of the first 8 seed or root souls. Where as most individuals "go with the flow" of the river of life, in my experience there is generally someone up ahead
creating the flow for others to folllow. So are we talking about "master creator" souls that take the One, self realize it but introduce 8 slightly different permutations that then spin off further permutation and so on.
If one was to line up the whole of humanity that ever existed in order of tallness, theoretically it could be done. In order of the "most kind ever" would be a little bit harder to obectively measure. At the level of talents, even as a metaphor for Knowledge, even more impossible, e.g. "best musician" ... but competence could be overwhelmed by soullessness, fabulous improvisation skills may exclude an ability to follow a score. Personally, I agree. Numberwise looks like a graveyard to me whilst life is constantly changing and largely unknowable. It can only exist in a system where there is a fixed end of time ... and time is all over. Look how it has manifest in the BKWSU where souls have almost universally been accepted on their thrones already.
But ... it is written into practically every religion, and is especially beloved of Hindu and Buddhism, so either it has objective truth or it has an appeal our hungry chattering minds than needs something to chew on to keep it quiet.