Who is Hiranyakashyapu? Dada Lekharaj or Veerendradev Dixit.
Posted: 01 Jan 2008
Aum Shanti.
It is said by Virendra Dev Dixit that Lekhraj Kirpalani accepted himself to be the Chariot of Supreme Soul Shiv. In other words accepted and said Shivoham and hence he enacted the part of demon Hiranyakashyapu. Virendra Dev Dixit has also explained the meaning of Hiranyakashyapu as the one who drinks or draws the golden vigour of others.
Now the question arises, whether is there any crime in accepting the Truth. GodFather (Parampita) Shiv Himself has declared openly that Lekhraj Kirpalani is His Chariot who has been renamed as Brahma and He, GodFather Shiv, gives Godly knowledge through Lekhraj Kirpalani And it is a fact that for about 18 years GodFather Shiv openly gave knowledge to all the interested children through Lekhraj Kirpalani Brahma. Suppose if President of India comes to some ordinary man's home and has a lunch. Is it a crime for that man in humbly accepting this fact. NO. Dada Lekharaj also did nothing else when he humbly accepted the fact that GodFather Shiv uses his body.
Can anyone say that Lekhraj Kirpalani after becoming Brahma, has anywhere anytime acted egoistically? Yes, he openly accepted the fact that he is Brahma and GodFather Shiv gives Godly Knowledge through him, but he never said that I (Lekhraj Kirpalani) am Shiv or that I am Supreme Soul (Paramatma). Lekhraj Kirpalani had the divine intoxication that he will be prince Krishna.
Next comes the act of drinking or drawing golden vigour out of others. Is there any B.K. of Lekhraj Kirpalani's time who says that Lekhraj Kirpalani's drishti or vision was vicious. Or has anyone said that Lekhraj Kirpalani used to instigate others to do his bodily worship by any kind. No. The only mistake I think he did was that he accetped to have Photo being taken with children and could not stop children from keeping his Photo. But in Murli classes children were advised of it's dangers. It was warned in Murlis that never remember Brahma as Lekhraj Kirpalani but remember GodFather Shiv in BrahmaBaba. And it was a fact which GodFather Shiv had openly declared and even D.L. openly accepted.
So, What crime did Lekhraj Kirpalani do? How can Virendra Dev Dixit accuse Lekhraj Kirpalani as being Hiranyakashyapu? Is it because of jealousy or does Virendra Dev Dixit has any proof of wrong doings of Brahma Baba? Only Virendra Dev Dixit can answer.
Let us see what GodFather Shiv has said in Murlis.
Virendra Dev Dixit has tried to establish himself as God but like a coward. He has no guts to accept openly what he is trying to prove since decades. There is no one in Advance Party who can publicly say that undoubtedly Supreme Soul Shiv has identified Himself in Virendra Dev Dixit But still Virendra Dev Dixit wants others to accept his ideas which he himself hesitates to accept.
Next, come to his actions. Virendra Dev Dixit. instigates girls and ladies to worship him bodily. He always draws attention of others towards his body. He instigates girls and ladies to have bodily contact with him. He draws sexual satisfaction and power through them in the name of making them pure. Is there any girl or lady in P.B.K.'s who can say it is difficult for her to forget Virendra Dev Dixit (as ShivBaba) and she is intoxicated by His (ShivBaba through Virendra Dev Dixit) Divine Love. Does her body language and mental state prove this. If no, then what kind of Gopis are these girls and ladies? And what kind of Sangamyugi Krishna is Virendra Dev Dixit.
If you do not know much about Gopis please read Bhagawat. It is written that the friend of Krishna who had great spiritual knowledge, when came to console Gopis of Vrindavan, as they were physically separated from Krishna, was surprised and enthralled on seeing and feeling the love Gops and Gopis had for Krishna. And here you have a lady who had even declared herself as wife of the so called Sangamyugi Krishna, Virendra Dev Dixit, the Supreme Soul, but has discarded her husband and lives with someone else. What kind of effect does she has even after having physical contacts with Virendra Dev Dixit and worshipping Virendra Dev Dixit?
I have drawn contrast between these two souls - Dada Lekharaj and Virendra Dev Dixit. Conclusion is left to you. You yourself decide who can be called Hiranyakashyapu.
Aum Shanti.
Sanjeev
It is said by Virendra Dev Dixit that Lekhraj Kirpalani accepted himself to be the Chariot of Supreme Soul Shiv. In other words accepted and said Shivoham and hence he enacted the part of demon Hiranyakashyapu. Virendra Dev Dixit has also explained the meaning of Hiranyakashyapu as the one who drinks or draws the golden vigour of others.
Now the question arises, whether is there any crime in accepting the Truth. GodFather (Parampita) Shiv Himself has declared openly that Lekhraj Kirpalani is His Chariot who has been renamed as Brahma and He, GodFather Shiv, gives Godly knowledge through Lekhraj Kirpalani And it is a fact that for about 18 years GodFather Shiv openly gave knowledge to all the interested children through Lekhraj Kirpalani Brahma. Suppose if President of India comes to some ordinary man's home and has a lunch. Is it a crime for that man in humbly accepting this fact. NO. Dada Lekharaj also did nothing else when he humbly accepted the fact that GodFather Shiv uses his body.
Can anyone say that Lekhraj Kirpalani after becoming Brahma, has anywhere anytime acted egoistically? Yes, he openly accepted the fact that he is Brahma and GodFather Shiv gives Godly Knowledge through him, but he never said that I (Lekhraj Kirpalani) am Shiv or that I am Supreme Soul (Paramatma). Lekhraj Kirpalani had the divine intoxication that he will be prince Krishna.
Next comes the act of drinking or drawing golden vigour out of others. Is there any B.K. of Lekhraj Kirpalani's time who says that Lekhraj Kirpalani's drishti or vision was vicious. Or has anyone said that Lekhraj Kirpalani used to instigate others to do his bodily worship by any kind. No. The only mistake I think he did was that he accetped to have Photo being taken with children and could not stop children from keeping his Photo. But in Murli classes children were advised of it's dangers. It was warned in Murlis that never remember Brahma as Lekhraj Kirpalani but remember GodFather Shiv in BrahmaBaba. And it was a fact which GodFather Shiv had openly declared and even D.L. openly accepted.
So, What crime did Lekhraj Kirpalani do? How can Virendra Dev Dixit accuse Lekhraj Kirpalani as being Hiranyakashyapu? Is it because of jealousy or does Virendra Dev Dixit has any proof of wrong doings of Brahma Baba? Only Virendra Dev Dixit can answer.
Let us see what GodFather Shiv has said in Murlis.
- ( Note: The Murli points are from the xerox copies of the original B.K. Murlis which are published in the book named 'Murli Khand-1'. The book is published by the Advance Party of Virendra Dev Dixit)
1) Murli date: 27.1.99, on page number 161.
"Human being calling himself God (Bhagawan) or Supreme Soul (Paramatma) this is totally wrong."
2) Murli date: 8.9.68, on page number 152.
(a) "Father himself is also called as Paramatma (Supreme Soul). His actual name is Shiv."
(b) "Father has explained that one who call himself as Paramatma (Supreme Soul) has himself worshiped by others is a demon like Hiranyakashyapu."
Virendra Dev Dixit has tried to establish himself as God but like a coward. He has no guts to accept openly what he is trying to prove since decades. There is no one in Advance Party who can publicly say that undoubtedly Supreme Soul Shiv has identified Himself in Virendra Dev Dixit But still Virendra Dev Dixit wants others to accept his ideas which he himself hesitates to accept.
Next, come to his actions. Virendra Dev Dixit. instigates girls and ladies to worship him bodily. He always draws attention of others towards his body. He instigates girls and ladies to have bodily contact with him. He draws sexual satisfaction and power through them in the name of making them pure. Is there any girl or lady in P.B.K.'s who can say it is difficult for her to forget Virendra Dev Dixit (as ShivBaba) and she is intoxicated by His (ShivBaba through Virendra Dev Dixit) Divine Love. Does her body language and mental state prove this. If no, then what kind of Gopis are these girls and ladies? And what kind of Sangamyugi Krishna is Virendra Dev Dixit.
If you do not know much about Gopis please read Bhagawat. It is written that the friend of Krishna who had great spiritual knowledge, when came to console Gopis of Vrindavan, as they were physically separated from Krishna, was surprised and enthralled on seeing and feeling the love Gops and Gopis had for Krishna. And here you have a lady who had even declared herself as wife of the so called Sangamyugi Krishna, Virendra Dev Dixit, the Supreme Soul, but has discarded her husband and lives with someone else. What kind of effect does she has even after having physical contacts with Virendra Dev Dixit and worshipping Virendra Dev Dixit?
I have drawn contrast between these two souls - Dada Lekharaj and Virendra Dev Dixit. Conclusion is left to you. You yourself decide who can be called Hiranyakashyapu.
Aum Shanti.
Sanjeev