Offtopic: Dear Admin, I'm reposting this article as 1st article is subject to edit. Please delete 1st article entitled 'About feminine language'.
Thanks for feedback reply. So, do you mean that as souls we should address each other as Brother & not as Sister irrespective of the gender status of our bodies? As all of us are Brothers, does not this mean that we all are 'spiritual sons' of the Supreme Father & none of us may be addressed as His 'spiritual daughter'??? Is this your logic? If yes, then the Supreme Father should not have to use any feminine kinship terminology like 'Bachchee, Kumari' to address any soul. But does not the references of such terminology (Bachchee/Kumari) in Murlis & Avyakt Vanis (indirectly) indicate that also the Supreme Father prefers to address some souls with feminine kinship terminology? - A big question!
And, if the Supreme Father also applies feminine terms to address some souls, then what's problem for you to use the feminine term 'PBK Sisters'?
Again, why the name 'Prajapita Brahmakumari' is suggested instead of 'Prajapita Brahmakumar'? Thus, according to Murlis, 'Prajapita Brahmakumari' is a valid term; then why do you avoid to use 'PBK Sisters'?
shivsena wrote:Moreover, i feel that irrespective of our bodies we are all souls and all souls are Brothers as per Murlis, so i address everyone as (soul) Brother.
Thanks for feedback reply. So, do you mean that as souls we should address each other as Brother & not as Sister irrespective of the gender status of our bodies? As all of us are Brothers, does not this mean that we all are 'spiritual sons' of the Supreme Father & none of us may be addressed as His 'spiritual daughter'??? Is this your logic? If yes, then the Supreme Father should not have to use any feminine kinship terminology like 'Bachchee, Kumari' to address any soul. But does not the references of such terminology (Bachchee/Kumari) in Murlis & Avyakt Vanis (indirectly) indicate that also the Supreme Father prefers to address some souls with feminine kinship terminology? - A big question!
And, if the Supreme Father also applies feminine terms to address some souls, then what's problem for you to use the feminine term 'PBK Sisters'?
Again, why the name 'Prajapita Brahmakumari' is suggested instead of 'Prajapita Brahmakumar'? Thus, according to Murlis, 'Prajapita Brahmakumari' is a valid term; then why do you avoid to use 'PBK Sisters'?