Andrey wrote:Only Supreme Soul comes and teaches reality ... <blah blah blah> ... Only one Supreme Soul comes and teaches the only possible correct method for non-violence and creation of heaven <snip> In the history one India has never gone on march to conquer lands ...
Reality !?!
WRONG. You are wrong and your God [ if this is what he teaches, which actually I doubt ] is wrong.
Fact : Under the Mauryan Empire Emperor Asoka lead a military invasion of Pakistan, Afghanistan, parts of Persia, Bengal and Assam and created more war with independent States. In one battle alone, 100,000 soldiers and civilians were killed, 100,000s affected by the destruction and fallout of war.
Andrey, I humbly caution that you are just revelling in your old time Bhakti preacher sanskars. You introduce your spiel with a " Baba says ... " and then dive off into your own Manmat for half an hour.
I will though attempt to keep picking you up on the mythology you and the BKs present as reality. Especially the reek and Romanticism of Pro-Indian nationalism that pervades its way right through BK-ism to the detriment of 'the Truth'. This is not meant as an insult to India or Indians. The truth is not India, it belongs to a bigger world view.
Unfortunately time does not allow and so I will just have to offer historical pointers for you or others to follow. I will attempt to direct you to a consideration about the identity of nation states and their relationships with the individuals within them. The concept of National indentity as defined by a line on a piece of paper is something very new in human consciousness.
When did this " India " of your and the BK's actually start to exist?
Probably post Partition / WWII. Probably born of Indian Nationalistic fervour. India was, and largely still is, a collection of small independent kingdoms and states all of which regularly warred with each other - and still are warring. A geographic Sub-Continent, not a political state. Geographical areas do not go to war other geographies, e.g. Europe has never gone to war with Africa. And there have been a fair few bloody thirsty Queen and Empresses making war not love in history.
Like all Empires, "India" - arguably a later British creation in my opinion - become so bloated and flaccid that its afluent and exploitative leaders was not even able to organise itself to defend itself from Colonial Invaders, never mind actually get its own act together to invade someone else. Indeed, there was no unity between these rules, largely only self-interest that the British and earlier the Mughals played wonderful to theri advantage.
The various smaller Empires that did exist within the geography of the Indian Sub-contintent generally fell to their own swords with treachery, assassination and internecine or sibling rivalry being the trend. " India" did not need to cross borders go to war with others. It drenched itself in its own blood, right up to the various Gandhis of last century.
I am sorry but your " India " - and my guess Dada Lekhraj's rather than " God's " India - never existed.
Like much of Europe up until Post WWII,
there was no such thing as the State of India Even at it peak, during Asoka's time, the States of Pandya and Cheras in southern India were not part of " India ", neither were parts of Orissa and Chhattisgarh in the West. It was not even " India ", it was one family's empire. [I will correct any of these approximate statements if errors are pointed out by references from actual Indian history scholars]. And let's ignore all the recent civil wars too?
Andrey, can you separate the romantic BK myths from reality now?
There is value in the moral teaching, no argument. There may even be some objective truth to the spiritual teachings. But your - and the BKs - pronouncements from the Gaddi have very little credibility.