shivsena wrote:I fail to understand one thing : on one hand you are trying to say that Ram is Prajapita who is present in the corporeal world and then you say that Ram(no 1 impure) becomes 'patit-pavan' and 'Maryadas purshottam' in the end by his effort; in Murlis it is said that ShivBaba is patit pavan bap and you say that Ram becomes patit-pavan bap(purifier of sinful) in the end; If Ram(no. 1 patit) becomes patit-pavan bap through his rememberence of bindi ShivBaba, so how can he be both Prajapita and pati-pavan bap at the same time ???
This ambiguity requires further clarification.
Dear Brother,
Omshanti. In the question posed to the BKs in connection with the Murli Point No.79,iIt has not been written that Ram becomes Patit Pavan (purifier of the sinful ones). It has been asked whether the soul of Ram (Baba Virendra Dev Dixit) cannot make more efforts than the soul of Krishna (Dada Lekhraj) in the Confluence Age to be praised as Patit-Paavan in the path of worship from the Copper Age.
In the path of worship they do not differentiate between the incorporeal Ram and the corporeal Ram, but we know that it is the incorporeal Ram (Shiv) who becomes Patit-Paavan through the corporeal Ram. If the corporeal Ram himself was Patit-Paavan then he could have purified the humanity even before the arrival of Shiv. But he cannot perform this task of purification of souls until and unless the incorporeal Ram (Shiv) enters in him.
With regards,
OGS,
Arjun