quantum wrote:But PP, now that you have 'critized' her, you run the risk of being 'sued', by the BK's, unless you can back it up with 'evidence'. according to ex-l. That's right!....we have proof in writing. How does that grab ya?
No, you've presented the opposite of what was written and deliberately fabricated more. I hope that's not a habit.
I wrote that you *can* voice your opinion and make criticisms, as long as they are specifically detailed, accurate and truth; and you are willing to substantiate them. It does not have to be in writing.
And it is we or the forum that would be sued (they are tried once), not members; as members remain anonymous.
Consider it a small pay off. We protect your anonymity, and you protect this forum's integrity and welfare.
It's the difference between saying, e.g. "xxx is a thief" (an insult) and "xxx stole this amount of money at this time", (a substantiated allegation). Or, as was written on this forum, "a high ranking BK leader encouraged BK followers that stealing from their work places for the sake of 'service' was acceptable".