The basis of science is 'logic'. Hard, difficult 'logic'. The basis of Brahma Kumaris is 'logical fallacy'. "False logics". Why are you trying to make thing fit a false logic? The 5,000 year Cycle is not true.
Really all you are doing is using words taken from physics, very superficially, to sell Brahma Kumarism. It is a yukti to make it (and yourself), sound more intelligent and attractive ... appealing to the egos of the listeners. Suggesting it will make them intelligent and attractive too.
At best, you are using the words like poetry. At worst, it is just all part of the kind of deceptive sales pitch which BKs are taught. Best stick to your own speciality.
If it was an equation, it would read something like:
That is to say, your end result bears no relationship to the bits you are adding together.
"Scientific process" or "scientific rigor" would be a very good thing to apply to spiritualism, i.e. approaching spiritualism in a scientific way, e.g.
{God is Truth} + {BapDada is Trikaldarshi (sees past, present and future)} = BapDada always tells the accurate truth in the past, present and future.
Now, in this equation, the evidence proves that BapDada has not always told the accurate truth. He has been fundamentally wrong to a huge scale on numerous occasions. So, therefore, we can work the equation backwards and have to accept that some or all parts are wrong.
Either {God is not Truth} or {BapDada is not Trikaldarshi} or {BapDada is not God}.
If you want an opinion on your Quantum Theories, try asking a scientist ... but you already know the response they will give. To say something like "to understand Hinduism, one has to understand Quantum Physics", what does that mean? How many people will ever understand Quantum Physics.
What are you really trying to say?