Your answer is very sincere. Thank you for taking the time to do so. I think that part of the problem with Chopra and other New Age gurus is that they 'learn how to bullsh** well" and I am afraid that the BK movement is studying the New Age gurus and learning to do so as well. That is why people call it "psychobabble" ... it is entertainment ... it is marketing not science ... at the end, you have the product and the cash registers.
Of course, I agree that some spiritual healing does have value. And that it is good for people who have left the BKWSU. It is very good to go and explore these things for yourself without cursing them as "Bhakti" and a competitive business, like the BKs do.
In fact, there is also scientific evidence now to support that spiritual healing works. Look out for studies done on Matthew Manning and others. And, no, "science" has not got a theory to explain it yet. That is part of the cultural problem.
Unfortunately, few people outside of science understand the nature and culture of science and so they misuse use and show disrespect to it.
It seems to me that you are being honest when you are talking about is an analogy or allegory. Not a scientific reality. A way of helping to understand a theory.
Is the soul "a point of energy" ... by science, no. It is not "energy". It may be a 'something' but we do not know yet. It is beyond science.
Is the soul "a point of energy"? We do not know yet. That is a Brahma Kumarism only. An applied value. A view from this body-conscious reality. Infinite ... infinitesimal ... eternal ... they are beyond comprehension.
Unfortunately, if you are 'scientifically' rigorous, as a practise and even experience, Brahma Kumari practise is so close to other hypnotic practises and experiences so as not to be able exclude that there is a hypnotic element to it. We really do not know what the experience is. Until you remove the hypnotic and psychic influences to Brahma Kumarism, you cannot tell what it truly is ... except by what you see materially.
Is the soul a 'something' ... OK, I can accept that ... but the problem with Brahma Kumarism is that it is a conveyor belt that takes us from a + b + c = 'xkysyfycz'. It all starts simple, easy and logical ... and then it is blow completely out of orbit and into an illusionary world based on false histories, guru manipulation, unprovable claims and logical fallacies. It become delusional very quickly. Most BKs are deluded. Highly deluded.
If you are interested in how another ex-BK, with some intelligence, copes with post-BKWSU life, look at the reinvention of BK Robert Shubow and his Sat Yoga, here:
http://www.satyogainstitute.org/. He also has a background in law. (I am not recommend him or it. I just find it interesting to see what is going on).