DrPreeti wrote:Pedophile Lekhraj didnt read any Sanatan scriptures nor did he give any proofs. Shivani was explaining the meaning ...
Welcome to the forum, Dr Preeti. Please allow me to dive straight in to the conversation without any pleasantries.
I don't think it's correct to call Lekhraj Kirpalani a pedophile. I don't know of any evidence to support that. And I always encourage activists or critics to be as accurate as possible, so as to avoid any easy defences from the BKs. I am presuming that you're referring to his relationship with at least Om Radhe? From memory, wasn't she over 16? (I forget).
He would safely make him an adulterer, among other things. I would stick to what we have good evidence of.
We know he read and started preaching from the Bhagavad Gita, although his level of knowledge was criticised as being poor at the time. We have to presume he had some knowledge of stories like the Ramayana as he makes references to it, also the Mahabharata and Shrimad Bhagavatam, although those may have just been from watching movies or listening to pundits.
What do you mean by "proofs"?
That is a word that comes up a lot in Indian BK and PBK world but not in the Western BKWSU, as proofs in the West would mean evidence, science etc.
As to the little "ditties" the BKs use ... as in the short, childish mnemonics they like to employ, e.g. "G.O.D equals Generator, Operator, Destroyer" ... it has been their habit from early days. And, yes, they are just nonsense from any classical point of view. BKism uses the language and concepts of other religion, but give them their own unique twist or inversion. There's nothing particularly new to Shivani's performance. She's really just an automaton, a robot, repeating what's she's heard within the BKWSU, without questioning it.
A "pretty parrot" who has the gift of repeating sounds. I never met her but I have to wonder if she's just on one big ego trip having been pushed into the BK spotlight.
I think the person who best summed up the BKs was Osho Rajneesh when he said something like that they had learned the art of talking complete nonsense, with total sincerity.
BKism is not Hinduism. It's a big mistake to try and understand it from that perspective. There's absolutely zero point trying to do so. Which is ironic to write as the BKs teach/believe that Hinduism is all wrong and just a partial, incorrect "memory" of BKism from 5,000 years ago.
It would be good for us to check whether you understand what BKism actually teaches first.
15 Jan 2025