An "independent judiciary" means a judiciary that is not put in place by the rulers or ruling party but puts itself into place or is elected ... and can hold the rulers or ruling party to justice
This is in contradiction to say, a dictatorship that choses judges from amongst its cronies knowing that they will do as they say or kills off ones it does not like.
I am sorry andrey, but you are showing your ignorance of the complexities of reality whilst ignoring the real question ... so how is Virendra Dev Dixit going to cope with running the combined BKWSU/AIVV by himself?
More than that, you appear to be forcing us all back into a caste system ... so what will be my position within it? (No need for an answer, it is another "magic wand" question. I know, another wave of the magic wand, or "magic flute", and all the molecules in creation will fall back into their original state).
Democracy is an ongoing process, no one would suggest that we have reached the destination yet. But there have been huge and evolutionary leaps especially in the Anglo-Saxon and Nordic countries, who have, after all, been exploring democracy governments for 1 or 2 thousand years (with a tip of the hat to the Greeks). All the BKWSU has to offer is a heavenly fantasy ... and enough evidence 70 years on to prove they stink to high heaven judged by standards most people in the West would expect as normal.
They are mired in the mould of third-world dictatorship, time warped and run like a local bhaibund ... albeit a relatively benign one. May be.
Even the Jews and Muslims have their own legal systems and courts ... are these more memorials ... are they not much less spiritual and enlightened beings? Ignorant Vyasa or Shudras?