Simon Blandford and More BKWSU re-writes
![Post Post](./styles/we_universal/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
For those of you interested in watching the BKWSU re-write the internet, here is another quote from one of the BKWSU IT Team, BK Simon Blandford. I should think card carrying BKs will be as confused as I am by this.
This was not on the Wikipedia article on the BKWSU but one on "End Times" predictions, e.g. Destruction. What was the original statement on the article?
Essentially, as far as I can see, one of Simon's modus operandi is to go about sticking "tags", such as "TotallyDisputed" on articles to attempt to defend the BKWSU by raising doubts about everything that is being said. Here he does it again to the BKWSU article. Simon writes, "so Brahma Kumaris are milleniumist [sister in charge] ... no need to over-emphasis point". I think he means "millenarianist".
I suggest this post is merged with one of the other topics, or we start a topic on BKWSU re-writes just to document what is going on for when the academics and journalist turn up.
Simon Blandford wrote:Revision as of 13:52, 3 February 2007 (edit) (undo)
Bksimonb (Talk | contribs)
(?Hinduism - No reference and inaccurate, unverified claim removed.)
This was not on the Wikipedia article on the BKWSU but one on "End Times" predictions, e.g. Destruction. What was the original statement on the article?
Wikipedia on "End Times" wrote:The length of Kalpa is said to be different by various groups from 5,000 years according the Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University to 4,320 million years in the terms of orthodox Hindus. The BKWSU is unique amongst Hindu cults in believing in a 5th age called the Confluence Age which correlates to the Christian concept of "End Times", a time of both destruction of the world and revelation of God. According to the BKWSU, humanity entered the End Times in approximately 1936 and the world will end currently in approximately 2036. Although there was a failed prediction of the end of the world in 1976.
Essentially, as far as I can see, one of Simon's modus operandi is to go about sticking "tags", such as "TotallyDisputed" on articles to attempt to defend the BKWSU by raising doubts about everything that is being said. Here he does it again to the BKWSU article. Simon writes, "so Brahma Kumaris are milleniumist [sister in charge] ... no need to over-emphasis point". I think he means "millenarianist".
I suggest this post is merged with one of the other topics, or we start a topic on BKWSU re-writes just to document what is going on for when the academics and journalist turn up.
- OK, we got to the bit about how having Yoga with the Dadis is good. Does having Yoga with the Wikipedia, as long as it is about the BKWSU, also count as BK Raja Yoga?