xpbk wrote:Trust me, I have re-verified each proof at least more than 5-6 times. My true intention is to help myself first and others.
"Proofs" is a PBK word and obsession. It does not mean proof, as in convincing 'real world' evidence, as the rest of the world would understanding it. It refers to interpretations of the utterances in the Sakar Murlis. You have picked this up from Virendra Dev Dixit but it is worth nothing in the real world.
You need real world evidence for whatever it is you are trying to prove.
Virendra Dev Dixit had an intuition that something was wrong with the history and philosophy of BKism, and he was right. There is no doubt. He was brainwashed and then treated badly and traumatised by the BKs. It appears that he never got over their rejection of his sincere interest. But, equally, there is no doubt that he is not god, nor has he a god or "the God" within him, so let that all go.
Why he had to come to the conclusions he did is something to with his own psychology. Perhaps a need to be special or chosen, to prove them wrong ... I don't know why, exactly.
Unfortunately, what we have discovered is that no amount of philosophical argument, nor real world historical evidence, influences the majority of BKs because their attachment and involvement with BKism is not rational nor intellectual. You might be "prove" your theory 100% ... and they would not be interested at all because BKism offers to them what they want; income, security, company, social status, a flattering look or identity, freedom from arranged marriage and so on.
You and your theory just offer them the destruction of all that and nothing to replace it but trouble.
Virendra Dev Dixit at least offered his disaffected, abused Matas a "BK analogue". A "better truth" from a BK/PBK point of view.
The real world, media, politicians etc, is not interested at all. All religions get up to sh*t. All religions re-write their history, produce hagiographic biographies. All religions have leadership schisms. It's just what they do. All politicians are interested is in numbers of voters. All the media is interested in is really serious, dirty sh*t which, in fairness, the BKs largely avoid. Sure, they destroy lives, and con and rob families but, right now, the media is more concerned by the religions that have guns and bombs.
Do I think they swapped out Lekhraj Kirpalani and Om Radhe for decoys? Not at all. I think you need a more down to earth explanation for your findings.
Do I think there is something in the PBK theory that there were other characters involved in the religion that left and have since died off? Yes, actually I do. There is a little real world evidence of it. You need to stick to the real world evidence and work like a detective piecing it all together.
Does it all really matter? Not from a real world point of view. BKism nor PBKism is not God. It's only relevent to the history of a fairly small, greedy, self-centred, narcissistic cult ... and, of course, those hurt by it.
Is the real world history and evidence worth finding out? I would say, "yes ... but unfortunately it has become very difficult to unravel now because so many of the original characters and their families etc have died off now". For example, Narain, Lekhraj Kirpalani's son, died recently.
You have Dadi Janki ... but a) she's not talking, and b) she wasn't even there in the earliest days; Gulzar ... but she's losing her marbles now and under guard 24/7. Most of the rest of the leadership only came to the BKs since the 1950s or 1970s.
Did you read there was no mention of God Shiva within the religion until around 1956? All of the comic book and official histories are bogus fabrications.