Brother Master Creator, this Forum, like many independent Forums you find on Internet. It is a facility through which people can exchange ideas. It is possible that majority of members have some opinion in common, but this doesn't mean that there's a partyline. Like there would not be a partyline on a windsfurfers' Forum or on a Forum for people who have travelled to Brazil and want to freely share info about that country.
Often those who are planning a trip to go there are asking some tips to those who have been there. So, on the ex-BK Forum there are democratically expressed ideas and aims that may not be homogeneous or may even - why not? - be in contrast with each other. Like it has been repeated many times, every poster represents himself only.
For sure, the common denominator that's visible is a personality trait that doesn't love uniforms or homologations. Thinking that the Forum is a solid unit or some sort of association is very dangerous, possibly is due to some typical programming, that creates the vision of the Forum as an "anti-BK" solid organization, and not a fluid, permanent assembly. A rainbow encompassing all nuances, some people being more or less distant or critical of the BK, Gyan, believing that BapDada is God or not or whatever.
Specifically regarding Murlis, some people, you know, care about principles. Being children of the Satguru, one can expect great love for clarity, honesty and transparency. It's in our DNA!!
. Even though they may be labeled as being "anti". One principle is that truth and original documents should not be hidden or manipulated, because such action decreses the value of the documents and teachings contained in them. The other principle is that such info should be made more extensively available. Difficult concepts to be understood if someone is conditioned by Bhakti and the caste system.
Traditionally in religions, scriptures have been re-written and kept secret by the establishment, for negative purposes. Possibly because the divine truth, expressed through prophets and religious founders, always had the effect of empowering masses and making them stand up for their rights, creating generations of revolutionaries. So it has to be hidden, or falsified, or detained by a higher caste, protecting the interests of those in power. Same happening in the BKWSU, nothing new.
Finally, I really don't see the contradiction you are pointing out, since an edited Murli maybe better than nothing, at least one of the principles, that of equality, would be respected and the Yagya would have the chance to create a positive pattern and be of an example, differentiating itself from Bhakti.