ex-l wrote:So you mean because that God is "elementary and superficial" (and lower middle class) because the audience is "elementary and superficial" (and lower middle class).
A lot of oldsters thought rock music was "elementary and superficial" compared to the intricacies of classical music. But much of it has aged very well, still sounds fresh today, and rates as significant artistic achievement.
A lot of BKs find depth and variety in the Avyakt Murlis. I understand that the sentences are extremely long and grammatically intricate, astonishingly so to those who understand Hindi. Some people love blues and listen all the time, some find the same old scales to be tiring. It is a value judgment, aesthetic judgment, is my point. Apparently in the earlier days Avyakt BapDada got his creds by speaking to people with deep knowledge of their lives that previously only BB had.
We don't criticise doctors or mechanics for sticking to procedures that work. Avyakt BapDada's style may not work for many of us, but He does seem to satisfy many BKs. Those that aren't satisfied, they leave, as we did.
Regards