04 Nov 2007
In the Avyakt Vanis, the unlimited service is said to be the service through the mind. It is not that i would like to stop the collecting of Murlis, please don't take it that way Brother John but it is also some diverting people's attention in a way, is not it?
Now that we also have the third, independent authority that can judge both BKs and PBKs in an equal manner, then this authority will also play its own games, is not it? Like in the outside world, in the BK or the PBK world there will be always some people that will show initiative and create activities under a fine name but it is, of course, only because they can become "in-charge of" it, is not it? Like they now make concerts "unite for diabethes" but it is just an ordinary concert under a good-to-sell label.
In the same manner, speculation with the Murli, because it is dear to many, can happen and lot of useless passion around the situation can exist. Yes, things are put in such a way so that we well understand that ... it is the only way. This is the rule now. Those who rule put some things down as per their wish and rise other things high. ShivBaba is thrown through the back door. Like in the Murli it is said - some are adorers of Krishna, some of Ram, no one asks ShivBaba.
On the path of Bakti also gurus say, "First you worship me for a little bit - then you can worship deities in the temple". In the same way, in the scientist's circle, the "big names" say, "Have you read my latest book? Please, read it so that we may discuss". Here also the matter of BK, PBK, ex-BK remains the same, there is still separation and there is still the importance of which-party, how-many-years-in-gyan and how-many-murlis-have-you-read.
We suffer only because we join some human, made up initiatives and listen to their matters. Of course, the final result is that it will bring unity amongst us, that will prove that through the forum and internet also some way of "service" can take place, (as well as "disservice") but also will it not bring some feeling of self-dignity that "see, we did it. The thing no one could do". Is not the BK family our own family and the PBK family? Then is there need for quarrels inside it?
The BKs don't give the Murli, because they believe in the rule for its distribution. They believe it is the correct way, the way it should be. Here we don't have any rules, so this is the toughest rule. If we look at the Murli, then we can extract that we have right over it, but it is also good to be deprived. There is accounting and our right cannot go away, if we don't have what is ours then it accumulates.
I mean that have we studied well whatever we have in possession, then only we can ask for more. If we ask in advance it is like greed. And this "Murli issue" becomes a course and cause for confrontation, out of which we take sorrow. If such is the case, better leave it. We already have everything we need no matter how little it is. We can also be content with little.
If we maintain such an attitude then others will automatically come to offer. Through asking nothing good will come. We may even receive, but it will not be as sweet as when we receive easily. So where is the taste for such tasteless things?